HAAWKS Launches 40 Weekly USDA Export Sales Data Points for Agricultural Markets

HAAWKS Launches 40 Weekly USDA Export Sales Data Points

On Thursday, July 16, 2026, HAAWKS expanded its agricultural market coverage with the launch of 40 structured data points from the USDA Weekly Export Sales Report.

Published every Thursday at 8:30 AM ET throughout the year, the report provides one of the most timely official indicators of international demand for U.S. agricultural commodities.

The new HAAWKS dataset covers weekly net export sales for wheat, corn, soybeans, cotton, and rice, with separate values for the current and next marketing years.

Unlike reports released after agricultural markets have closed, the Weekly Export Sales Report is published while the principal futures contracts are actively trading. This makes speed, accurate normalization, and machine-readable delivery especially important for algorithmic and event-driven market participants.

What HAAWKS Delivers

HAAWKS will disseminate 40 data points covering five major commodity groups and their relevant product classifications.

Commodity	Data Coverage
Wheat Various types and classes	Net sales for the current marketing year and next marketing year
Corn	Net sales for the current marketing year and next marketing year
Soybeans Various types	Net sales for the current marketing year and next marketing year
Cotton Various types	Net sales for the current marketing year and next marketing year
Rice Various types	Net sales for the current marketing year and next marketing year

The individual product and commodity classifications provide more detailed information than a single headline export-sales figure. This allows users to identify differences in demand across crop types, qualities, and delivery periods.

Why Weekly Export Sales Matter

The USDA Weekly Export Sales Report provides a current view of overseas demand for U.S. agricultural products.

Strong net sales may indicate improving international demand, increased forward purchasing, or progress toward USDA full-year export projections. Weak sales, cancellations, or net reductions may point to softer demand, changing destination activity, or stronger competition from other exporting countries.

However, the market does not react only to whether sales appear high or low.

The most important signal is frequently the difference between the reported value and what market participants expected before the release.

A weekly corn export-sales figure may be supportive if it exceeds expectations, but the same figure may be disappointing if traders anticipated an even larger result.

For systematic analysis, the core event signal can be expressed as:

Export-sales surprise = reported net sales − expected net sales

The size and direction of that surprise can then be assessed alongside:

• The previous reporting week

• Recent weekly averages

• Seasonal export patterns

• Outstanding export commitments

• Reported cancellations

• Major destination activity

• Progress toward USDA export projections

• Current and next marketing year allocations

Current and Next Marketing Year Sales

HAAWKS provides separate data points for the current marketing year and the next marketing year.

Current marketing year net sales represent new commitments, adjustments, and cancellations for delivery during the active marketing year. These figures are particularly relevant to near-term demand and the pace required to meet annual export forecasts.

Next marketing year net sales represent forward commitments for delivery after the current marketing year ends. They can provide an early indication of demand for the upcoming crop cycle and may become increasingly important as the current marketing year approaches its conclusion.

Separating the two periods helps traders and analysts distinguish immediate demand from longer-term purchasing activity.

It also prevents a large next-year sale from being interpreted as an equally strong signal for nearby supply and demand conditions.

What Are Net Export Sales?

Net export sales represent newly reported sales after accounting for cancellations, reductions, destination changes, and other adjustments.

A positive number generally indicates that new sales exceeded cancellations and reductions during the reporting period.

A negative number can occur when cancellations or downward adjustments are larger than newly reported sales.

Net sales are therefore not the same as physical exports or shipments. A sale represents a commitment, while an export represents the physical movement of the commodity.

For a complete demand assessment, traders may compare net sales with:

• Physical exports

• Outstanding sales

• Accumulated exports

• Destination-level activity

• Historical seasonal patterns

• USDA annual export forecasts

Released During Active Futures Trading

The report is published every Thursday at 8:30 AM ET while major agricultural futures markets are open.

CME grain and oilseed futures, including corn, soybeans, and wheat, continue trading until 8:45 AM ET during the overnight session. Trading then pauses before the main daytime session begins at 9:30 AM ET.

ICE Cotton No. 2 futures are also actively trading at 8:30 AM ET.

This creates two important reaction windows.

Time	Market Event	Relevance
8:30 AM ET	USDA Weekly Export Sales Report released	Immediate data ingestion and event detection
8:30–8:45 AM ET	CME grain and oilseed futures remain open	Initial algorithmic price discovery
8:45–9:30 AM ET	CME grain and oilseed trading pause	Further analysis and order preparation
9:30 AM ET	CME daytime session begins	Broader liquidity and potential follow-through
9:30 AM ET	Regular U.S. stock and ETF trading begins	Potential reaction in related listed instruments

The 15-minute period between the report release and the end of the overnight CME session is especially relevant for automated traders.

During this window, systems can ingest the new figures, compare them with expectations, identify material surprises, apply risk controls, and generate trading signals while the underlying futures remain tradable.

Directly Relevant Markets

The data is most directly relevant to futures and options linked to the commodities included in the report:

• CBOT corn futures and options

• CBOT soybean futures and options

• CBOT wheat futures and options

• KC hard red winter wheat futures and options

• Minneapolis hard red spring wheat futures and options

• ICE Cotton No. 2 futures and options

• CBOT rough rice futures and options

The report may also be relevant to related commodity spreads and processing relationships, including soybean crush components and differences among wheat classes.

The strength of the market reaction depends on more than the headline figure. It can also be affected by the reporting period, destination, size of revisions or cancellations, seasonal demand, existing positioning, liquidity, and whether the result was already anticipated.

Designed for Algorithmic Trading Workflows

Many HAAWKS clients consume market news through automated or algorithmic systems rather than by manually reading and interpreting reports.

For these users, an official report published as a document or web page must first be converted into standardized fields before it can be used reliably.

HAAWKS transforms the USDA release into structured data points designed for systematic consumption.

The dataset can support workflows such as:

• Real-time event detection

• Automated estimate comparison

• Surprise calculation

• Commodity and product classification

• Current-year and next-year separation

• Cancellation and net-reduction detection

• Historical event analysis

• Quantitative model inputs

• Automated alerts

• Trading signal generation

• Risk-management checks

• Dashboard and API integration

Consistent field definitions are particularly important when the same report contains numerous commodities, product types, marketing years, destinations, and adjustments.

By normalizing the data, HAAWKS allows systems to compare each new observation with prior releases without repeatedly interpreting the underlying report structure.

From Release to Market Signal

An algorithmic workflow may process the report in several stages:

1. Receive the structured HAAWKS data.

2. Validate the commodity, product type, and marketing year.

3. Compare the reported figure with the expected value.

4. Calculate the size and direction of the surprise.

5. Compare the result with prior weeks and historical ranges.

6. Apply commodity-specific signal thresholds.

7. Check liquidity, market conditions, and risk limits.

8. Generate an alert, analytical output, or trading instruction.

Not every statistical surprise creates a meaningful price move.

A large soybean sales figure, for example, may have limited impact if it was widely expected or if it reflects a previously announced transaction. Conversely, an unexpected cancellation or net reduction may matter even when the absolute weekly figure appears relatively small.

The HAAWKS dataset provides the structured inputs needed for users to make those distinctions within their own models and strategies.

More Than a Headline Figure

The detailed structure of the Weekly Export Sales Report helps users look beyond aggregate demand.

Important questions include:

• Which commodity or product class was sold?

• Does the sale apply to the current or next marketing year?

• Were previous commitments cancelled or reduced?

• Which destinations were involved?

• Are sales concentrated among one or several buyers?

• How does the result compare with the pace needed to meet USDA projections?

• Are reported commitments translating into physical exports?

• Is one commodity class performing differently from another?

For wheat, cotton, rice, and soybeans, product-level differences can be particularly important. Strong demand for one class or type does not necessarily imply equally strong demand for the broader commodity category.

Expanding HAAWKS Agricultural Coverage

The addition of USDA Weekly Export Sales data strengthens HAAWKS’ coverage of both the demand and supply sides of agricultural markets.

USDA Crop Progress data provides insight into planting, crop development, condition, and harvest activity.

USDA Export Sales data provides insight into international demand, cancellations, and forward purchasing commitments.

Together, the datasets help users monitor how U.S. production conditions interact with global demand throughout the agricultural cycle.

By delivering official USDA information in a clean, structured, and machine-readable format, HAAWKS helps traders and analysts move more efficiently from report publication to systematic market analysis.

For algorithmic participants, that means receiving structured data while the directly relevant futures markets are still trading.

Sources

1. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service — Export Sales Reporting Program
   Official information about the reporting program and the Thursday 8:30 AM ET release schedule.
   https://www.fas.usda.gov/programs/export-sales-reporting-program
2. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service — Weekly Export Sales
   Official weekly reports and downloadable export-sales data.
   https://apps.fas.usda.gov/esrqs/#/reports
3. CME Group — Corn Futures
   Contract information and trading hours for CBOT corn futures.
   https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/grains/corn.html
4. CME Group — Soybean Futures
   Contract information and trading hours for CBOT soybean futures.
   https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/oilseeds/soybean.html
5. CME Group — Chicago Wheat Futures
   Contract information and trading hours for CBOT wheat futures.
   https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/grains/wheat.html
6. CME Group — KC Hard Red Winter Wheat Futures
   Contract information for KC HRW wheat futures.
   https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/grains/kc-wheat.html
7. CME Group — Rough Rice Futures
   Contract information and trading hours for rough rice futures.
   https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/grains/rough-rice.html
8. ICE — Cotton No. 2 Futures
   Official contract specifications and trading hours.
   https://www.ice.com/products/254/Cotton-No-2-Futures

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Natural Gas Futures Drop 39 Ticks in 11 Seconds After EIA Storage Report

According to our analysis natural gas moved 39 ticks on DOE Natural Gas Storage Report (WNGSR) data on 16 July 2026.

Natural gas (39 ticks)

Charts are exported from JForex (Dukascopy).

---

HAAWKS Research

Natural Gas Storage Build Triggers a 39-Tick Selloff in 11 Seconds

U.S. natural gas futures reacted sharply after the EIA reported a 41 Bcf storage injection, with the market looking beyond the slightly smaller-than-expected build to focus on abundant inventories and strong domestic production.

July 16, 2026 • Release time: 10:30 a.m. ET • Week ending July 10, 2026

The U.S. Energy Information Administration reported that working natural gas inventories increased by 41 billion cubic feet during the week ending July 10, bringing total Lower 48 storage to 3,024 Bcf.

The build was slightly smaller than the Reuters analyst consensus of 43 Bcf and below the five-year average injection of 45 Bcf. Despite the modestly tighter weekly flow, natural gas sold off immediately after the release.

HAAWKS first read: The market did not treat the smaller-than-expected injection as a sustainable bullish signal. Traders instead focused on inventories remaining 6.4% above the five-year average, rising production and softer LNG feedgas demand.

Storage Report at a Glance

Weekly Injection +41 Bcf Reuters consensus: +43 Bcf

Total Storage 3,024 Bcf Lower 48 working gas

vs. Five-Year Average +181 Bcf 6.4% above average

vs. One Year Ago −21 Bcf 0.7% below last year

Weekly natural gas storage report compared with forecasts and historical levels

Storage Indicator	Reported	Comparison	HAAWKS Read-through
Weekly Net Change	+41 Bcf	Reuters forecast: +43 Bcf	The injection was 2 Bcf below consensus, representing a slightly tighter weekly result than expected.
Five-Year Average Injection	+45 Bcf	Actual was 4 Bcf smaller	The weekly flow was below normal, but the total inventory surplus remained substantial.
Total Working Gas	3,024 Bcf	3,045 Bcf one year ago	Inventories were 21 Bcf, or 0.7%, below the comparable year-earlier level.
Five-Year Average Stocks	2,843 Bcf	Current stocks: +181 Bcf	The 6.4% storage surplus continued to provide a bearish buffer against weather-driven demand.

Immediate Market Reaction

39 Ticks Lower

Natural Gas Fell 39 Ticks in 11 Seconds

The HAAWKS tick chart recorded an immediate 39-tick decline in natural gas within the first 11 seconds following the 10:30 a.m. ET storage release. The speed of the move showed that the market interpreted the broader storage and supply backdrop as bearish, despite the injection coming in slightly below expectations.

Natural gas market reaction following the weekly EIA storage report

Market	Measured Move	Time Window	Initial Direction	Interpretation
Natural Gas	39 ticks	11 seconds	Lower	Immediate selling indicated that surplus inventories and broader supply conditions outweighed the slightly smaller weekly build.

Regional Storage Breakdown

The Midwest recorded the largest regional injection at 20 Bcf, followed by the East with 14 Bcf. The South Central region added only 3 Bcf as a 5 Bcf withdrawal from salt facilities partially offset an 8 Bcf injection into nonsalt storage.

Regional changes in U.S. natural gas storage for the week ending July 10, 2026

Region	Working Gas	Weekly Change	vs. Last Year	vs. Five-Year Average
East	614 Bcf	+14 Bcf	−1.9%	+1.7%
Midwest	749 Bcf	+20 Bcf	+3.0%	+6.2%
Mountain	240 Bcf	+4 Bcf	+2.6%	+21.2%
Pacific	319 Bcf	0 Bcf	+8.5%	+21.8%
South Central	1,103 Bcf	+3 Bcf	−5.2%	+2.7%
Total Lower 48	3,024 Bcf	+41 Bcf	−0.7%	+6.4%

Why Did Natural Gas Fall?

The Storage Surplus Remained Large

Although the weekly injection was slightly smaller than expected, inventories remained 181 Bcf above the five-year average. That surplus continued to limit concerns about supply availability during the summer cooling season.

Production Remained Strong

Lower 48 natural gas production averaged approximately 110.3 Bcf per day during July. Strong output gave the market confidence that storage could remain adequately supplied even as electricity demand increased.

LNG Feedgas Flows Were Below Their Peak

Feedgas flows to major U.S. LNG export terminals averaged around 17.4 Bcf per day during July, below the record level reached in April. Reduced export demand left more domestic supply available to the U.S. market.

HAAWKS view: The 41 Bcf injection was nominally supportive because it came in below both consensus and the five-year average. However, the 39-tick selloff showed that traders placed greater weight on the continuing inventory surplus, high production and subdued LNG demand.

What Traders Should Watch Next

Weather remains the most important near-term variable. Sustained heat across the Midwest and East could increase power-sector gas consumption and produce a smaller injection in the next storage report.

Traders should also monitor Lower 48 production, LNG terminal activity and the pace at which the five-year storage surplus narrows. A series of tighter injections would be more important than a single below-average build.

The next EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report is scheduled for July 23, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. ET.

HAAWKS Conclusion

The July 16 natural gas storage report delivered a slightly tighter result than expected. The 41 Bcf injection was below the 43 Bcf Reuters consensus and the 45 Bcf five-year average build.

The immediate market response was nevertheless decisively bearish. Natural gas dropped 39 ticks in only 11 seconds, demonstrating that the market remained more concerned with abundant total inventories than with the modest weekly miss.

Total working gas stood at 3,024 Bcf—21 Bcf below the prior-year level but still 181 Bcf above the five-year average. This left the market adequately supplied and reduced the urgency to price a near-term shortage.

The key message is that the headline injection cannot be viewed in isolation. Storage levels, production, weather, electricity demand and LNG exports collectively determine whether a report is genuinely bullish or bearish.

Trade smart. Stay informed. Stay ahead.

Sources

1. U.S. Energy Information Administration — Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report
   Official source for the 41 Bcf injection, total Lower 48 inventories, regional storage changes and comparisons with last year and the five-year average.
2. Reuters — U.S. natural gas prices slide on rising production and ample storage
   Used for the 43 Bcf analyst consensus, five-year average injection, production, LNG flows and broader futures-market context.
3. HAAWKS internal natural gas tick-chart analysis — July 16, 2026
   Used for the measured release-window market reaction of 39 ticks lower in 11 seconds.

Disclaimer: This material is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Trading involves risk, and past market behavior is not indicative of future results.

---

Haawks G4A low latency machine-readable data is one of the fastest data feeds for DOE data.

Please let us know your feedback. If you are interested in timestamps, please send us an email to sales@haawks.com.

June 2026 CPI: Cooler Inflation Sends the Dollar Lower and Risk Assets Higher

According to our analysis USDJPY moved 21 pips, EURUSD moved 17 pips, US500 moved 76 ticks and XAUUSD 34 points on US BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI) data on 14 July 2026.

USDJPY (21 pips)

EURUSD (17 pips)

US500 (76 ticks)

XAUUSD (34 points)

Charts are exported from JForex (Dukascopy).

---

HAAWKS Research

June 2026 CPI: Inflation Cools Faster Than Expected

A sharp decline in energy prices and an unexpectedly soft core reading triggered immediate moves across currencies, gold and U.S. equities.

July 14, 2026 • Release time: 8:30 a.m. ET • Consumer Price Index

The June 2026 U.S. Consumer Price Index delivered a clear downside inflation surprise. Headline CPI declined 0.4% month over month, while annual inflation slowed to 3.5%. Core CPI, which excludes food and energy, was unchanged during the month and slowed to 2.6% year over year.

The report was softer than economists had expected at both the headline and core levels. Markets responded by selling the U.S. dollar and moving into rate-sensitive assets, including gold and U.S. equities.

HAAWKS first read: The release reduced immediate inflation anxiety, but the details require balance. Falling energy prices drove much of the headline decline, while the unchanged core reading showed that underlying inflation also cooled during June.

CPI Estimates vs. Actual Release

Headline CPI MoM −0.4% Forecast: −0.1%

Headline CPI YoY 3.5% Forecast: 3.8%

Core CPI MoM 0.0% Forecast: +0.2%

Core CPI YoY 2.6% Forecast: 2.8%

June 2026 CPI estimates compared with actual results

Inflation Indicator	Estimate	Actual	HAAWKS Read-through
Headline CPI MoM	−0.1%	−0.4%	A materially softer monthly reading, driven primarily by lower energy prices.
Headline CPI YoY	3.8%	3.5%	Annual inflation slowed more quickly than markets expected.
Core CPI MoM	+0.2%	0.0%	The unchanged core index was an important downside surprise.
Core CPI YoY	2.8%	2.6%	Underlying annual inflation continued moving toward a more moderate pace.

What Drove the Inflation Decline?

Energy was the largest contributor to the monthly decline. The energy index fell 5.7%, while gasoline prices dropped 9.7%. Those declines more than offset increases in food and shelter.

Food prices increased 0.2% during June, while shelter rose only 0.1%—its smallest monthly increase since January 2021. Motor vehicle insurance, communication, apparel, medical care and used vehicle prices also declined.

Key components of the June 2026 Consumer Price Index

CPI Component	Monthly Change	Annual Change	Interpretation
All Items	−0.4%	+3.5%	The largest monthly headline decline since April 2020.
Core CPI	0.0%	+2.6%	Underlying price pressures were unchanged during the month.
Energy	−5.7%	+15.7%	The largest contributor to the monthly CPI decline.
Gasoline	−9.7%	+26.7%	A sharp monthly reversal, although prices remained elevated compared with a year earlier.
Shelter	+0.1%	+3.3%	The smallest monthly shelter increase since January 2021.
Food	+0.2%	+3.0%	Food inflation remained positive but relatively contained.

Market Impact at a Glance

HAAWKS tick charts captured the initial release-window moves immediately following the 8:30 a.m. ET CPI announcement.

Market impact following the June 2026 CPI release

Market	Measured Move	Initial Direction	HAAWKS Interpretation
USD/JPY	21 pips	Lower	The dollar weakened against the yen as traders reduced the probability of near-term Federal Reserve tightening.
EUR/USD	17 pips	Higher	The euro advanced as the softer inflation reading pressured the broader U.S. dollar.
US500	76 ticks	Higher	Equities rallied as the inflation surprise reduced immediate concerns about restrictive monetary policy.
XAU/USD	34 points	Higher	Gold benefited from a weaker dollar and lower expectations for near-term interest-rate increases.

Cross-Asset Market Reading

Foreign Exchange

The immediate FX response was a weaker U.S. dollar. USD/JPY moved lower, while EUR/USD moved higher. This was consistent with markets reducing expectations that the Federal Reserve would need to tighten policy in the immediate future.

Gold

Gold produced one of the strongest reactions. Softer inflation generally supports non-yielding assets when it lowers Treasury yields and weakens the dollar. The HAAWKS measurement recorded a 34-point release-window advance.

U.S. Equities

The US500 initially gained 76 ticks. The market interpreted the report as supportive for valuations because inflation cooled without the release itself presenting a direct signal of collapsing economic demand.

HAAWKS view: The release created a broadly dovish cross-asset response—USD lower, gold higher and equities higher. The core CPI miss strengthened the move because the moderation was not limited entirely to volatile energy prices.

What the CPI Report Means for the Fed

The June figures gave policymakers additional breathing room. Headline inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s longer-term objective, but both headline and core CPI came in below expectations.

The report does not eliminate future inflation risk. Much of the headline decline reflected lower gasoline and energy prices, which can reverse quickly. Renewed pressure on oil markets could therefore make upcoming inflation reports less favorable.

For traders, the key question is whether the softer core readings continue. A sustained moderation in shelter and services inflation would provide a stronger signal than a single energy-driven monthly decline.

HAAWKS Conclusion

The June CPI release was decisively softer than expected. Headline prices fell 0.4%, core prices were unchanged and both annual measures undershot consensus forecasts.

Markets reacted in a clear and coordinated manner: the dollar weakened, gold advanced and the US500 rallied. The HAAWKS measurements recorded 21 pips in USD/JPY, 17 pips in EUR/USD, 76 ticks in the US500 and 34 points in XAU/USD.

The report offered short-term relief from inflation concerns, but it should not be viewed as an all-clear signal. Energy volatility remains a material risk, and annual headline inflation was still elevated.

The central message is therefore one of moderation rather than victory: inflation cooled faster than expected, underlying pressure eased and markets rapidly repriced the near-term policy outlook.

Trade smart. Stay informed. Stay ahead.

Sources

1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — Consumer Price Index, June 2026 . Official CPI figures, component data and release details.
2. Reuters — U.S. consumer inflation preview and economist consensus
   Used for the pre-release market estimates for headline and core consumer inflation.
3. Reuters — Traders reduce expectations for a July Fed rate increase
   Used for market-implied Federal Reserve policy expectations following the report.
4. HAAWKS internal tick-chart screenshots captured on July 14, 2026. Used for the measured release-window moves in USD/JPY, EUR/USD, US500 and XAU/USD.

Disclaimer: This material is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Trading involves risk, and past market behavior is not indicative of future results.

---

Start futures forex fx news trading with Haawks G4A low latency machine-readable data, one of the fastest machine-readable news trading feed for US macro-economic and commodity data.

Please let us know your feedback. If you are interested in timestamps, please send us an email to sales@haawks.com.

June 2026 NFP: Softer Payroll Growth Triggers Sharp Moves Across FX, Gold and US500 on US Employment Situation (NFP)

According to our analysis USDJPY moved 37 pips, EURUSD moved 25 pips, XAUUSD (spot gold) moved 43 points and US500 moved 56 ticks (118 ticks total) on US Employment Situation (Non-farm payrolls / NFP) data on 2 July 2026.

USDJPY (37 pips)

EURUSD (25 pips)

XAUUSD (43 points)

US500 (56 ticks)

Charts are exported from JForex (Dukascopy).

---

June 2026 NFP: Softer Jobs, Stable Wages, Sharp Market Reaction

HAAWKS Research | July 2, 2026

The June 2026 U.S. Nonfarm Payrolls release delivered a classic “soft but not broken” labor-market signal. Payroll growth slowed materially, but unemployment remained low and wage growth stayed contained. For markets, that combination was enough to trigger immediate volatility across FX, gold, and equity index futures.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 57,000 in June, while the unemployment rate stood at 4.2%. Average hourly earnings increased 0.3% month over month and 3.5% year over year. The prior two months were also revised lower by a combined 74,000 jobs, with April revised to +148,000 and May revised to +129,000.

Research Estimates vs. Actual Release

Ahead of the release, market expectations were for a stronger labor print. Consensus estimates pointed to nonfarm payrolls rising by roughly 110,000, unemployment near 4.3%, and average hourly earnings increasing 0.3% month over month.

The actual release came in softer on headline job creation, but broadly stable on unemployment and wages.

Indicator	Estimate	Actual	HAAWKS Read-through
Nonfarm Payrolls	+110K	+57K	Clear downside miss. Headline job creation came in softer than expected.
Unemployment Rate	4.3%	4.2%	Better than expected, though the participation-rate decline softened the signal.
Average Hourly Earnings MoM	+0.3%	+0.3%	In line. Wage growth remained contained.
Average Hourly Earnings YoY	+3.5%	+3.5%	In line. No upside wage shock.
Prior-Month Revisions	—	-74K	April and May were revised lower, pointing to softer labor momentum than previously reported.

The headline payroll miss was the main surprise. However, wage growth did not accelerate, unemployment remained low, and the report avoided the kind of broad deterioration that would suggest an immediate labor-market break.

Market Impact: HAAWKS Tick-Chart Reaction

The HAAWKS market-impact screenshots captured the immediate release-window volatility:

Market	Measured Impact	Direction	HAAWKS Interpretation
USD/JPY	37 pips	Lower	The U.S. dollar sold off sharply against the yen after the softer payroll print.
EUR/USD	25 pips	Higher	The euro rallied as dollar weakness spread across major FX pairs.
XAU/USD	43 points	Higher	Gold rallied as traders repriced rate expectations following the weaker jobs number.
US500	56 ticks	Higher	Equities initially caught a bid as slower job growth supported the soft-landing narrative.

The market reaction was consistent with a softer-than-expected labor report. The U.S. dollar weakened, gold rallied, and equities reacted positively to the possibility that slower job growth could reduce pressure on the Federal Reserve to keep policy restrictive for longer.

Sector Detail: Slower Hiring, Not a Full Breakdown

The report showed continued job gains in professional and business services, social assistance, and health care, while leisure and hospitality lost 61,000 jobs. That divergence matters. It suggests the labor market is not uniformly weak, but momentum is becoming narrower.

The downward revisions were also important. A one-month payroll miss can be dismissed as noise; a miss combined with negative revisions tells a more cautious story. The labor market still appears functional, but the pace of hiring is clearly cooling.

HAAWKS Conclusion

The June NFP release was not a recession signal, but it was a warning that the labor market is losing speed.

For traders, the key takeaway was not simply that payrolls missed. It was the combination of:

Soft job creation, stable wages, lower unemployment, and negative revisions.

That mix created a “Goldilocks” reaction in markets: weak enough to pressure the dollar and support rate-sensitive assets, but not weak enough to trigger immediate risk-off panic.

Asset Class	Reaction	Why It Moved	Trading Takeaway
FX	Dollar weaker	The headline payroll miss reduced near-term support for the U.S. dollar.	USD vulnerability remained the cleanest immediate signal.
Gold	Gold stronger	Softer labor data supported lower-rate sensitivity and demand for precious metals.	XAU/USD remained supported while rate-cut expectations held firm.
Equities	Risk initially bid	Stable wages and softer hiring helped support the soft-landing view.	US500 strength reflected relief rather than a broad growth acceleration signal.
Rates Narrative	Dovish lean	The report was soft enough to support easing expectations, but not weak enough to trigger panic.	The market reaction fit a classic “Goldilocks” setup.

The HAAWKS read:

USD vulnerability remains the cleanest short-term signal, while gold and equity indices may continue to benefit if incoming data supports the view that inflation pressure is easing without a sharp employment shock.

Final Takeaway

The June 2026 NFP report reinforced a market theme that traders cannot ignore:

Labor momentum is cooling, wage pressure is stable, and markets are increasingly sensitive to every data point that affects the Fed path.

For HAAWKS traders, the opportunity is not just in the headline number. It is in understanding how that number moves liquidity, volatility, and cross-asset positioning in real time.

Trade smart. Stay informed. Stay ahead.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Sources

1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — Employment Situation Summary, June 2026
   Used for the official NFP release figures, including +57K nonfarm payrolls, 4.2% unemployment, +0.3% monthly wage growth, +3.5% annual wage growth, labor-force participation, sector detail, and prior-month revisions.
2. Reuters — U.S. job growth likely cooled in June after recent string of big gains
   Used for pre-release market expectations, including the +110K nonfarm payroll estimate and 4.3% unemployment forecast.
3. Reuters — Nasdaq, S&P 500 decline with tech; investors assess softer jobs data
   Used for equity-market context following the softer-than-expected jobs report.
4. Reuters — Dollar slides after soft jobs report, yen surges
   Used for U.S. dollar and yen market reaction after the NFP release.
5. Reuters — Gold gains after weak U.S. payrolls report
   Used for gold-market reaction and rate-expectation context after the payroll miss.
6. HAAWKS internal tick-chart screenshots, captured July 2, 2026.
   Used for measured release-window market impact: USD/JPY 37 pips, EUR/USD 25 pips, XAU/USD 43 points, and US500 56 ticks.

---

Start forex fx futures news trading with Haawks G4A low latency machine-readable data today, one of the fastest news data feeds for US macro-economic and commodity data.

Please let us know your feedback. If you are interested in timestamps, please send us an email to sales@haawks.com.

USDA Crop Progress: Market Impact on Futures, Ethanol, ETFs, and Ag Stocks

USDA Crop Progress: Immediate and Next-Day Market Impact Across Futures, Ethanol, ETFs, and Ag Stocks

Every Monday during the U.S. growing season, the USDA Crop Progress Report gives agricultural markets a fresh read on planting, emergence, crop conditions, and harvest progress.

For traders and analysts, the report is more than an update on field activity. It is a weekly supply-side signal that can influence expectations for yield, production, input costs, and short-term price discovery across directly linked agricultural markets.

At HAAWKS, we are introducing structured weekly Crop Progress data points across major U.S. crops to help market participants analyze those signals faster and more consistently.

What HAAWKS will track

HAAWKS will disseminate 30 weekly data points from the USDA Crop Progress Report, covering six major U.S. crops:

Table 1: HAAWKS Crop Progress Data Coverage

Crop	Data Points
Corn	Planted, emerged, good/excellent condition, harvested
Soybeans	Planted, emerged, good/excellent condition, harvested
Cotton	Planted, squaring, good/excellent condition, harvested
Rice	Planted, emerged, good/excellent condition, harvested
Winter wheat	Planted, emerged, good/excellent condition, harvested
Spring wheat	Planted, emerged, good/excellent condition, harvested

These indicators provide a high-frequency view of crop development and crop health before final yield and production estimates are known.

Why Crop Progress can move markets

The market does not react simply because a Crop Progress number is high or low.

It reacts when the number is different from what traders expected.

A corn crop rated 67% good/excellent may be bullish if the market expected 70%. The same 67% rating may be bearish if the market expected 64%. The important variable is the surprise.

In practice, the reaction framework is straightforward:

Table 2: Crop Progress Surprise and Typical Market Interpretation

Crop Progress Surprise	Typical Market Interpretation
Better-than-expected good/excellent ratings	Higher yield potential, usually bearish for futures
Worse-than-expected good/excellent ratings	Greater production risk, usually bullish for futures
Faster-than-expected planting	Lower acreage or timing risk, often bearish
Slower-than-expected planting	Higher acreage or yield risk, often bullish
Faster-than-expected harvest	More near-term supply availability, often bearish nearby futures
Slower-than-expected harvest	Delayed supply movement, often supportive nearby futures

The strongest research evidence is in corn and soybeans, where academic work has found that USDA Crop Progress and condition information can affect futures price discovery around the report window. The effect is especially important during the most weather-sensitive periods of the growing season.

Immediate impact: the first tradable window

The USDA Crop Progress Report is released at 4:00 PM ET. That timing matters.

Most directly linked U.S. agricultural futures markets are already closed when the report is published. As a result, the first clean futures reaction usually happens when markets reopen in the evening session.

Table 3: First Direct Reaction Window by Market

Market	First Direct Reaction Window
Corn futures	Monday evening reopen, around 8:00 PM ET
Soybean futures	Monday evening reopen, around 8:00 PM ET
Wheat futures	Monday evening reopen, around 8:00 PM ET
Rough rice futures	Monday evening reopen, around 8:00 PM ET
Cotton No. 2 futures	Monday evening reopen, around 9:00 PM ET
Ethanol futures	Potentially same day, because ethanol futures are generally still open at the 4:00 PM ET release time

This means Crop Progress data is often digested before the evening futures reopen. Traders have time to compare the USDA figures against estimates, prior-week levels, five-year averages, weather forecasts, and crop-stage sensitivity.

Next-day impact

For many users, the most practical impact window is the next trading day.

Tuesday’s session reflects a more complete market response, including overnight futures trading, new analyst commentary, updated weather models, and broader liquidity from U.S. equity and ETF markets.

Useful next-day measures include:

Table 4: Next-Day Market Impact Measures

Metric	What It Captures
Monday settlement to evening reopen	First futures repricing opportunity
First 30–60 minutes after reopen	Immediate futures price discovery
Monday settlement to Tuesday settlement	Full next-day futures impact
Tuesday ETF open vs. prior close	Equity-market translation of the futures move
Tuesday stock open vs. prior close	Operational exposure repricing

This distinction is important for ETFs and stocks. U.S. equities close at 4:00 PM ET, the same time the USDA report is released. While after-hours trading may exist, the cleaner and more liquid equity-market reaction usually occurs the next regular trading day.

Directly linked futures markets

Crop Progress data is most directly relevant for futures tied to the underlying crops.

Table 5: Directly Linked Futures Markets

Crop Progress Data	Direct Futures Market
Corn	CBOT corn futures and options
Soybeans	CBOT soybean futures and options
Winter wheat	CBOT wheat and KC hard red winter wheat futures and options
Spring wheat	Minneapolis hard red spring wheat futures and options
Cotton	ICE Cotton No. 2 futures and options
Rice	CBOT rough rice futures and options
Corn supply outlook	CME denatured fuel ethanol futures

The futures impact is usually clearest in corn and soybeans because these markets are highly liquid and because Crop Progress data directly informs expectations around planting success, crop health, yield potential, and harvest timing.

The corn–ethanol connection

Ethanol belongs in the Crop Progress discussion because corn is the primary feedstock for U.S. ethanol production.

A stronger-than-expected corn crop can reduce concern about corn availability and input costs for ethanol producers. A weaker-than-expected corn crop can raise concern about feedstock costs and pressure ethanol margins.

The connection is not always one-directional. Ethanol prices also depend on gasoline blending economics, energy prices, Renewable Identification Numbers, export demand, operating rates, inventories, and policy. Still, Crop Progress data can directly affect the corn-cost side of the ethanol margin equation.

A simplified framework:

Table 6: Corn Crop Progress and Ethanol Market Relevance

Crop Progress Signal	Corn Market Effect	Possible Ethanol-Market Relevance
Better corn condition than expected	Bearish corn input-cost signal	May support ethanol margins if ethanol prices hold
Worse corn condition than expected	Bullish corn input-cost signal	May pressure ethanol margins
Faster harvest than expected	More near-term corn availability	Can ease feedstock availability concerns
Slower harvest than expected	Delayed corn movement	Can tighten local supply and basis conditions

For this reason, ethanol futures and ethanol-exposed companies are directly linked to corn Crop Progress data, even if the reaction is filtered through margins rather than through crop price alone.

Directly linked ETFs

For equity-market participants, the cleanest ETF links are futures-based agriculture funds.

Table 7: Directly Linked ETFs

ETF	Direct Link
CORN	Corn futures exposure
SOYB	Soybean futures exposure
WEAT	Wheat futures exposure
DBA	Broad agriculture futures basket
TILL	Futures exposure to corn, wheat, soybeans, and sugar

These ETFs are not Crop Progress instruments themselves. Their link comes from the futures they hold or reference. If Crop Progress creates a meaningful move in corn, soybean, or wheat futures, the effect may be reflected in the relevant futures-based ETF during the next ETF trading session.

Directly linked stocks

Stocks are less pure than futures or futures-based ETFs, but several companies have direct operational exposure to corn, ethanol, grain merchandising, or oilseed processing.

Table 8: Directly Linked Stocks

Stock	Crop Progress Link
Green Plains	Corn feedstock costs and ethanol crush margins
Alto Ingredients	Renewable fuels, specialty alcohols, and ethanol-market exposure
The Andersons	Grain merchandising and ethanol/renewables exposure
Archer-Daniels-Midland	Corn processing, ethanol, oilseeds, and grain merchandising
Bunge Global	Oilseed processing, grain origination, and merchandising
Valero Energy	Ethanol segment exposure, though diluted by larger refining operations

For stocks, the Crop Progress signal is usually indirect at the share-price level. A corn condition surprise may affect ethanol margins or merchandising opportunities, but company-specific news, energy prices, crush margins, balance-sheet factors, and broader equity-market conditions can dominate.

The cleanest stock impact is usually in companies with meaningful ethanol or grain-processing exposure, particularly when the Crop Progress surprise is large enough to change expectations for corn costs, soybean supply, or harvest timing.

Public sources for pre-release estimates

Because markets react to surprises, estimates matter.

The most useful comparison is:

Actual USDA value minus pre-release consensus estimate.

Publicly available estimate sources may include:

Table 9: Public Sources for Pre-Release Estimates

Source Type	Use
Reuters analyst polls, often republished by agricultural media	Consensus expectations for planting, harvest, or condition ratings
Pro Farmer	Pre-report estimate summaries and market commentary
Agriculture.com / Successful Farming	Reuters-based Crop Progress estimates and report coverage
Farm Progress / Farm Futures	Analyst expectations and post-report comparisons
Barchart / Brugler commentary	Estimate references, crop-rating commentary, and condition-index interpretation
DTN / Progressive Farmer	USDA Crop Progress summaries and analyst context
USDA NASS prior week and five-year average	Historical baseline, not a consensus estimate

Prior-week values and five-year averages are important context, but they are not the same as market expectations. A number can be above the five-year average and still disappoint traders if expectations were even higher.

How HAAWKS helps

The value of Crop Progress data is highest when it can be used immediately.

HAAWKS structures the weekly USDA Crop Progress release into clean, real-time data points so users can compare the latest report against the previous week, historical benchmarks, and market estimates.

This helps traders, analysts, and agricultural market participants answer the key questions quickly:

Did the USDA number beat or miss expectations?

Was the surprise large enough to matter?

Which futures markets are directly linked?

Could the reaction carry into ethanol, ETFs, or directly exposed ag stocks the next day?

Conclusion

USDA Crop Progress data is one of the most important weekly inputs for U.S. agricultural market analysis during the growing season.

The strongest immediate and next-day impact is typically seen in directly linked futures markets, especially corn and soybeans. The data can also influence ethanol through the corn feedstock channel and may carry into futures-based agriculture ETFs and directly exposed ag stocks during the next equity-market session.

For market participants, the key is not the absolute number. It is the surprise versus expectations, the seasonal timing of the report, and the market’s ability to translate crop progress into supply, yield, and margin expectations.

By delivering structured Crop Progress data, HAAWKS helps users move from raw USDA figures to market-relevant analysis faster.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Sources

1. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service — Crop Progress
   Source for the Crop Progress report description, coverage, and weekly release schedule.
   https://esmis.nal.usda.gov/publication/crop-progress

2. CME Group — Corn Futures Contract Specifications
   Source for CME grain futures trading hours, including the evening reopen schedule relevant to corn, soybeans, wheat, and rough rice.
   https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/grains/corn.html

3. ICE — Cotton No. 2 Futures
   Source for ICE Cotton No. 2 trading hours.
   https://www.ice.com/products/254/Cotton-No-2-Futures

4. CME Group — Denatured Fuel Ethanol Futures FAQ
   Source for ethanol futures trading hours and the daily maintenance window.
   https://www.cmegroup.com/articles/faqs/faq-denatured-fuel-ethanol.html

5. CME Group — Are Corn and Ethanol Markets Correlated?
   Source for the corn–ethanol market connection, including corn as the primary U.S. ethanol input and ethanol’s share of domestic corn disappearance.
   https://www.cmegroup.com/openmarkets/energy/2024/Are-Corn-and-Ethanol-Markets-Correlated.html

6. USDA Economic Research Service — Global Demand for Fuel Ethanol Through 2030
   Source for the statement that ethanol manufacturers use about 40% of the U.S. corn crop for ethanol and related co-products.
   https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=105761

7. Lehecka, G. V. — The Value of USDA Crop Progress and Condition Information: Reactions of Corn and Soybean Futures Markets
   Academic source supporting the market impact of USDA Crop Progress and condition information on corn and soybean futures.
   https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/168261.html

8. Bethlem et al. — The Impact of the USDA Soybean Crop Condition Reports on Soybean Futures Prices
   Academic source supporting next-day soybean futures price reaction to changes in good/excellent soybean crop ratings.
   https://www.scielo.br/j/resr/a/vcxYjcBRQYWDd6HL6Vq85WF/?lang=en

9. Bain and Fortenbery — Impact of Crop Condition Reports on National and Local Wheat Markets
   Academic source showing weaker or mixed evidence for wheat crop condition reports compared with corn and soybeans.
   https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-and-applied-economics/article/impact-of-crop-condition-reports-on-national-and-local-wheat-markets/F0BC21D69B41FEE1FF420ADD6FC65431

10. Teucrium — CORN Fund
    Source for futures-based ETF exposure to corn.
    https://teucrium.com/corn

11. Teucrium — SOYB Fund
    Source for futures-based ETF exposure to soybeans.
    https://teucrium.com/soybeans

12. Teucrium — WEAT Fund
    Source for futures-based ETF exposure to wheat.
    https://teucrium.com/weat

13. Teucrium — TILL Fund
    Source for broader futures-based agricultural exposure.
    https://teucrium.com/till

14. Invesco — DB Agriculture Fund (DBA)
    Source for DBA’s exposure to a rules-based index of agricultural commodity futures.
    https://www.invesco.com/us/en/financial-products/etfs/invesco-db-agriculture-fund.html

15. Green Plains Annual Report
    Source for Green Plains’ corn feedstock exposure in dry-mill ethanol production.
    https://gpreinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Green-Plains-2023-Annual-Report_Web.pdf

16. ADM — Industrial Ethanol Products
    Source for ADM ethanol production from corn feedstock.
    https://www.adm.com/en-us/products-services/industrial-biosolutions/products/ethanol/

116 ticks potential forex fx futures news trading profit from 1 event in June 2026 with Haawks G4A machine-readable data feed

According to our analysis there was a potential of 116 ticks potential profit out of the following event in June 2026. The potential performance in 2025 was 1,828 pips / ticks.

June 2026

Cumulative potential, indicative performance June 2026, please see all releases below.

• USDA Grain Stocks and USDA Acreage (116 ticks / 30 June 2026)

Total trading time would have been around 2 minutes! (preparation time not included)

You can click on each release for detailed information.

---

June 2026 Monthly Wrap-Up: One USDA Release, 116 Ticks of Opportunity

Meta description: June was a quiet month for scheduled HAAWKS grain-event coverage, but USDA’s June 30 Acreage and Grain Stocks reports still delivered 116 ticks of potential opportunity across corn, wheat, and soybeans. Here is what moved, why it mattered, and what traders should watch next.

June was a quieter month for scheduled grain-event trading opportunities, with unfortunately only one major HAAWKS release in focus. But the month still ended with a meaningful USDA catalyst. On June 30, USDA published its Acreage and Grain Stocks reports, giving corn, wheat, and soybean traders a fresh summer setup and producing around 116 ticks of potential profit across ZC, ZW, and ZS futures. According to our analysis, soybeans moved around 48 ticks, wheat around 40 ticks, and corn around 28 ticks after the release.

The June Event: USDA Acreage and Grain Stocks

The June 30 reports delivered a mixed but tradable message. Old-crop supplies looked comfortable, while new-crop acreage shifted the balance of weather risk heading into July and August.

USDA estimated corn planted area at 95.3 million acres, down 3% from 2025. Soybean planted area rose to 85.4 million acres, up 5% year over year, while all wheat planted area fell to 42.7 million acres, down 6%. On the stocks side, June 1 inventories were higher for the major grain and oilseed contracts: corn stocks were 5.29 billion bushels, up 14% from last year; soybean stocks were 1.06 billion bushels, up 5%; and old-crop all wheat stocks were 920 million bushels, up 8%.

For traders, the takeaway was not simply bullish or bearish. The reports created a two-sided summer market: heavier old-crop inventories may cap nearby rallies, but acreage uncertainty and summer weather still leave room for new-crop volatility.

Corn: Bearish Stocks, Weather Optionality

Corn carried the clearest old-crop supply pressure. Larger June 1 stocks make it harder for nearby futures to sustain rallies without a demand or weather catalyst. However, planted acreage was lower year over year, and USDA’s survey still left some planting uncertainty in the final acreage picture.

That means December corn remains vulnerable to weather premium. If July forecasts turn hotter or drier, the market can quickly shift from old-crop comfort to new-crop risk pricing.

Soybeans: Bigger Acres, Stronger Demand Clues

Soybeans were pressured by the larger acreage number, but the stocks report included a more supportive demand detail. March-May disappearance was stronger than last year, which helped offset the bearish tone from expanded planted area.

The soybean setup now depends heavily on August weather, crush demand, export headlines, and whether the larger acreage base translates into comfortable production. November soybeans may struggle in benign weather, but the market remains exposed to sharp rallies if conditions deteriorate.

Wheat: Lower Acres Need Confirmation

Wheat had the most supportive acreage story, with all wheat planted area down 6% from last year. But the bullish acreage signal was softened by larger old-crop stocks.

That leaves wheat needing confirmation from yield, quality, export demand, Black Sea headlines, or adverse weather. Lower acres support the structure, but larger inventories reduce the urgency to chase rallies without a second catalyst.

Macro Outlook: June Data Arrives in July

The next macro calendar is important because June reference-month data will be released in July, just as grain markets move deeper into the weather-risk window.

The first major event is U.S. Nonfarm Payrolls for June, scheduled for July 2 at 8:30 a.m. ET. Labor-market data matters for rates, the dollar, and broader risk appetite, all of which can spill into commodities.

Inflation then returns to center stage. June CPI is scheduled for July 14 at 8:30 a.m. ET, followed by June PPI on July 15 at 8:30 a.m. ET. These releases will help shape expectations ahead of the late-July FOMC meeting.

Growth and consumer data will also matter. June retail sales are scheduled for July 16, while Q2 advance GDP and June Personal Income and Outlays / PCE are both scheduled for July 30 at 8:30 a.m. ET.

Central banks remain another source of volatility. The next FOMC meeting is scheduled for July 28-29, with the policy decision due on July 29. The ECB Governing Council monetary policy meeting is scheduled for July 22-23, with the Day 2 decision and press conference on July 23.

Grains Outlook: WASDE, Crop Progress, and Summer Weather

On the grain side, the market now shifts from acreage math to weather execution.

The next major USDA balance-sheet event is the July WASDE, scheduled for July 10 at 12:00 p.m. ET. This report will be the first major opportunity for USDA to incorporate the June acreage framework into updated supply-and-demand expectations.

Weekly Crop Progress reports also become increasingly important. USDA lists upcoming July releases for July 6, July 13, July 20, and July 27 at 4:00 p.m. ET. These reports will help traders track corn condition, soybean development, winter wheat harvest progress, and any early signs of stress from heat or dryness.

Other recurring grain-market inputs to watch include export sales, export inspections, ethanol production, weather-model updates, basis behavior, and CFTC positioning. The Commitments of Traders report is usually released on Fridays at 3:30 p.m. ET and can help show whether funds are adding to or reducing exposure in corn, wheat, and soybeans.

Bottom Line

June may have delivered only one major HAAWKS-covered grain-event opportunity, but it was an important one. The USDA Acreage and Grain Stocks reports produced 116 ticks of potential opportunity and reset the market narrative for summer.

Corn is balancing heavier old-crop stocks against new-crop weather risk. Soybeans have more acres but also stronger demand signals. Wheat has fewer acres, but larger stocks mean rallies still need confirmation.

The practical takeaway for traders is clear: old-crop supply cushions matter, but July is where weather, macro data, and USDA balance sheets begin to interact. After a quiet June, the next phase may be more active.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

---

Start futures/forex/oil/grains news trading with Haawks G4A low latency machine-readable data today, we offer one of the fastest machine-readable data feeds for US macro-economic and commodity data and macro-economic data from Norway, Sweden, Turkey, Switzerland and ECB interest rates and statement.

Please let us know your feedback and check out our G4A low latency data feed.

All data is machine readable and available via API access in Chicago, New York and London. Free trials.

Greedy 4 Alpha

Low latency machine-readable macro-economic and commodity data for professionals

116 ticks potential profit on 30 June 2026, analysis on trading corn, wheat and soybeans futures on USDA Grain Stocks and USDA Acreage data

According to our analysis corn (ZC), wheat (ZW) and soybeans (ZS) futures prices moved around 28 / 40 / 48 ticks (total 116) on USDA Grain Stocks and USDA Acreage data on 30 June 2026.

Soybeans (48 ticks)

Charts are exported from JForex (Dukascopy).

---

USDA June Data: Bearish Old-Crop Stocks Meet a New-Crop Acreage Reset

Meta description: USDA’s June 2026 Acreage and Grain Stocks reports give grain traders a fresh setup: heavier old-crop corn, soybean, and wheat stocks, lower corn and wheat acreage, and a larger soybean footprint heading into summer weather risk.

The Trade Setup

USDA’s June 30 Acreage and Grain Stocks reports gave traders a classic two-sided summer market: old-crop supplies look heavier, but new-crop acreage introduces fresh risk premium.

The headline acreage numbers were clear. Corn planted area is estimated at 95.3 million acres, down 3% from 2025. Soybean planted area rose 5% to 85.4 million acres. All wheat planted area dropped 6% to 42.7 million acres, while cotton acreage increased 6% to 9.85 million acres. USDA reported larger year-over-year inventories for the three major grain and oilseed contracts. June 1 corn stocks were 5.29 billion bushels, up 14% from last year. Soybean stocks were 1.06 billion bushels, up 5%. Old-crop all wheat stocks were 920 million bushels, up 8%.

For traders, the immediate read is not simply “bearish” or “bullish.” It is more nuanced: nearby supply is comfortable, but the acreage mix changes the sensitivity of new-crop balance sheets to July and August weather.

Corn: Stocks Lean Bearish, Acreage Keeps Weather Premium Alive

Corn gave the market a bearish old-crop signal. USDA’s 5.29 billion bushels of June 1 corn stocks were up 14% year over year. On-farm stocks rose 16%, while off-farm stocks rose 12%. March-May indicated disappearance was 3.74 billion bushels, compared with 3.50 billion during the same quarter last year.

That disappearance number shows demand wimply “bearish” or “bullish.” It is more nuanced: nearby supply is comfortable, but the acreage mix changes the sensitivity of new-crop balance sheets to July and August weather.

Corn: Stocks Lean Bearish, Acreage Keeps Weather Premium Alive

Corn gave the market a bearish old-crop signal. USDA’s 5.29 billion bushels of June 1 corn stocks were up 14% year over year. On-farm stocks rose 16%, while off-farm stocks rose 12%. March-May indicated disappearance was 3.74 billion bushels, compared with 3.50 billion during the same quarter last year.

That disappearance number shows demand was better than last year, but not enough to offset the larger supply cushion. The larger on-farm stock figure also matters for basis. If producers remain patient, cash markets may stay supported locally. If futures rally on weather and farmer selling accelerates, basis could soften quickly in surplus regions.

The acreage number complicates the bearish stocks story. Corn planted acreage at 95.3 million acres is down from last year, with harvested-for-grain acreage forecast at 87.4 million acres. USDA also noted that 1.90 million acres of corn were still left to be planted when survey data were collected, and that final planted acreage has a 90% historical range of 93.0 million to 97.7 million acres around the current estimate.

Trader read: Old-crop corn stocks cap nearby rallies, but lower acreage means December corn can still build weather premium quickly if forecasts turn hot and dry. The cleanest trade lens is old-crop pressure versus new-crop weather optionality.

Soybeans: Acreage Expands, But Demand Is the Bullish Detail

Soybeans delivered a larger acreage number, which is naturally bearish for new-crop supply assumptions. USDA estimated soybean planted acreage at 85.4 million acres, up 5% from 2025, with harvested acreage forecast at 84.4 million acres.

But the stocks report was not one-dimensional. June 1 soybean stocks were **1.06 bDecember corn can still build weather premium quickly if forecasts turn hot and dry. The cleanest trade lens is old-crop pressure versus new-crop weather optionality.

Soybeans: Acreage Expands, But Demand Is the Bullish Detail

Soybeans delivered a larger acreage number, which is naturally bearish for new-crop supply assumptions. USDA estimated soybean planted acreage at 85.4 million acres, up 5% from 2025, with harvested acreage forecast at 84.4 million acres.

But the stocks report was not one-dimensional. June 1 soybean stocks were 1.06 billion bushels, up 5% from last year. However, on-farm stocks were down 11%, while off-farm stocks rose 16%. March-May indicated disappearance was also 1.06 billion bushels, up 18% from the same period a year earlier.

That stronger disappearance figure is the key for traders. Expanded acres pressure the new-crop balances been active enough to keep the bull case alive, especially if crush margins, export demand, or weather risk tighten the forward outlook.

USDA also reported 8.05 million soybean acres left to be planted during the survey window, and the final soybean planted acreage estimate has a 90% historical range of 82.8 million to 87.9 million acres around the current estimate.

Trader read: November soybeans may struggle if weather is benign, but demand signals make the market vulnerable to sharp rallies if August weather turns threatening. Soybean spreads may remain especially sensitive to crush demand and export headlines.

Wheat: Lower Acres Versus Larger Stocks

Wheat has the clearest acreage contraction. USDA estimated all wheat planted area at 42.7 million acres, down 6% from 2025. Winter wheat area was 31.5 million acres, down 5%, while other spring wheat fell 6% and Durum acreage dropped 16%.

At the same time, old-crop wheat stocks were not tight. USDA reported 920 million bushels of old-crop all wheat in storage as of June 1, up *ather turns threatening. Soybean spreads may remain especially sensitive to crush demand and export headlines.

Wheat: Lower Acres Versus Larger Stocks

Wheat has the clearest acreage contraction. USDA estimated all wheat planted area at 42.7 million acres, down 6% from 2025. Winter wheat area was 31.5 million acres, down 5%, while other spring wheat fell 6% and Durum acreage dropped 16%.

At the same time, old-crop wheat stocks were not tight. USDA reported 920 million bushels of old-crop all wheat in storage as of June 1, up 8% from a year earlier. On-farm stocks were down 4%, but off-farm stocks were up 11%.

For futures, that mix argues for caution chasing rallies that are based only on acreage. Lower acres matter, but higher old-crop stocks reduce urgency unless yield, quality, export demand, or global wheat news adds fuel.

Trader read: Wheat needs a catalyst. Lower acreage supports the structure, but larger inventories make weather and export demand the deciding variables.

Sorghum and Pulses: Smaller Markets, Bigger Percentage Moves

Sorghum was one of the sharper stocks stories. June 1 grain sorghum stocks totaled 66.7 million bushels, down 33% from a year ago. March-May indicated disappearance was 105 million bushels, up 107% from the same period last year.

That is a meaningful tightening signal, even if sorghum does not drive the main board the way corn, soybeans, and wheat do. Regional feed demand, export interest, and relative value against corn could become more important.

Pulse crop stocks also moved sharply. Lentil stocks were up 94%, all chickpea stocks were up 40%, and dry edible pea stocks were up 19% from June 1, 2025.

Trader read: These markets matter most for regional cash trade and specialty-crop pricing, but the percentage changes are too large to ignore.

What Traders Should Watch Next

The June reports shift at, or global wheat news adds fuel.

Trader read: Wheat needs a catalyst. Lower acreage supports the structure, but larger inventories make weather and export demand the deciding variables.

Sorghum and Pulses: Smaller Markets, Bigger Percentage Moves

Sorghum was one of the sharper stocks stories. June 1 grain sorghum stocks totaled 66.7 million bushels, down 33% from a year ago. March-May indicated disappearance was 105 million bushels, up 107% from the same period last year.

That is a meaningful tightening signal, even if sorghum does not drive the main board the way corn, soybeans, and wheat do. Regional feed demand, export interest, and relative value against corn could become more important.

Pulse crop stocks also moved sharply. Lentil stocks were up 94%, all chickpea stocks were up 40%, and dry edible pea stocks were up 19% from June 1, 2025.

Trader read: These markets matter most for regional cash trade and specialty-crop pricing, but the percentage changes are too large to ignore.

What Traders Should Watch Next

The June reports shift attention to three market drivers.

First, weather now carries more weight for corn and soybeans. Corn acreage is lower, soybean acreage is higher, and both final acreage estimates still have uncertainty because survey data were collected before planting was fully complete.

Second, basis behavior will matter. Larger corn and wheat stocks can pressure cash markets, especially if futures rallies trigger farmer selling. Soybeans are more complicated because total stocks are higher, but on-farm stocks are lower and spring disappearance was strong.

Third, spreads may tell the story before flat price does. Heavy old-crop stocks argue against panic in nearby supply, while new-crop acreage and weather risk create room for volatility farther out the curve.

Bottom Line

USDA’s June numbers are not a directional signal. They are a volatility setup.

Corn carries bearish old-crop stocks but still has new-crop weather risk. Soybeans gained acres, but demand has been strong enough to keep traders alert. Wheat lost acreage, but larger old-crop stocks mean rallies need confirmation from weather, quality, or export demand.

The practical takeaway for traders: respect the supply cushion, but do not ignore the summer risk premium. The market now moves from acreage math to weather execution.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Sources: https://esmis.nal.usda.gov/sites/default/release-files/795959/grst0626.pdf, https://esmis.nal.usda.gov/sites/default/release-files/795961/acrg0626.pdf

---

Haawks G4A is one of the fastest machine-readable data feeds for USDA data. We are beating big names in the industry by seconds. Coverage includes monthly USDA WASDE (World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates), quarterly USDA Grain Stocks, yearly USDA Prospective Plantings and USDA Acreage and weekly USDA Crop Progress.

Please let us know your feedback. If you are interested in timestamps, please send us an email to sales@haawks.com.

HAAWKS Adds Weekly USDA Crop Progress Data for Major U.S. Crops

HAAWKS Expands Agricultural Coverage with Weekly USDA Crop Progress Data

HAAWKS is pleased to announce the upcoming introduction and dissemination of new data points from the weekly USDA Crop Progress Report, one of the key reference sources for monitoring the development and condition of major U.S. crops throughout the growing season.

Released every Monday at 4:00 PM ET from April through November, the USDA Crop Progress Report provides timely updates on planting, emergence, crop conditions, and harvesting progress across major agricultural commodities. The next release is scheduled for 22 June 2026.

To support faster analysis and better market visibility, HAAWKS will introduce 30 weekly crop progress data points, covering six major U.S. crops:

Corn
Planted, emerged, conditions good & excellent, harvested

Soybeans
Planted, emerged, conditions good & excellent, harvested

Cotton
Planted, squaring, conditions good & excellent, harvested

Rice
Planted, emerged, conditions good & excellent, harvested

Winter Wheat
Planted, emerged, conditions good & excellent, harvested

Spring Wheat
Planted, emerged, conditions good & excellent, harvested

By making these data points available in a structured and timely format, HAAWKS helps traders, analysts, and agricultural market participants track crop development more efficiently and respond more quickly to changing supply-side conditions.

The addition of USDA Crop Progress data further strengthens HAAWKS’ commitment to delivering high-quality, market-relevant agricultural data that supports informed decision-making across the commodity markets.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Source: https://esmis.nal.usda.gov/publication/crop-progress

146 pips/ticks potential forex fx futures news trading profit from 4 events in May 2026 with Haawks G4A machine-readable data feed

According to our analysis there was a potential of 146 pips/ticks potential profit out of the following 4 events in May 2026. The potential performance in 2025 was 1,828 pips / ticks.

May 2026

Cumulative potential, indicative performance May 2026, please see all releases below.

• DOE Petroleum Status Report (WPSR) (57 ticks / 6 May 2026)

• DOE Natural Gas Storage Report (WNGSR) (39 ticks / 7 May 2026)

• US BLS Producer Price Index (PPI) (20 ticks / 13 May 2026)

• DOE Natural Gas Storage Report (WNGSR) (30 ticks / 28 May 2026)

Total trading time would have been around 5 minutes! (preparation time not included)

You can click on each release for detailed information.

---

2026 News Trading Update: DOE (EIA) and PPI Reports Continue to Drive Fast Futures Market Moves

May 2026 delivered another active stretch for futures news traders, with several U.S. economic and commodity releases producing sharp short-term market moves. Across petroleum, natural gas, and inflation data, our analysis found meaningful tick movement shortly after key reports were released.

The strongest move in this period came from the DOE Petroleum Status Report on May 6, 2026, when crude oil moved 57 ticks in 40 seconds. Natural gas also remained highly responsive to DOE Natural Gas Storage Report data, moving 39 ticks on May 7 and 30 ticks on May 28. The U.S. BLS Producer Price Index report on May 13 also triggered a notable move in US500 futures, with the market moving 5 points, or 20 ticks, in 37 seconds.

Together, these events added to a potential 2026 performance figure of 911 pips, compared with 1,828 pips in 2025.

DOE Petroleum Status Report: Crude Oil Moves 57 Ticks on May 6

The DOE Petroleum Status Report released on May 6, 2026, produced the largest move in this group. According to our analysis, light sweet crude oil moved 57 ticks in 40 seconds following the report.

The underlying EIA data pointed to a tighter petroleum market. For the week ending May 1, U.S. commercial crude oil inventories fell by 2.3 million barrels to 457.2 million barrels. Although crude stocks remained about 1% above the five-year average for this time of year, the weekly draw showed that supply was being pulled lower as refinery activity remained strong.

Refineries operated at 90.1% of operable capacity, with crude oil refinery inputs averaging 16.0 million barrels per day. Gasoline and distillate production both declined slightly, while imports also moved lower. Crude oil imports averaged 5.5 million barrels per day, down 273,000 barrels per day from the previous week.

Fuel inventories also tightened. Motor gasoline inventories fell by 2.5 million barrels, leaving stocks about 4% below the five-year average. Distillate fuel inventories declined by 1.3 million barrels and stood about 11% below the five-year average.

The price data reinforced the market pressure. WTI crude stood at $105.38 per barrel on May 1, up $6.96 from the previous week and sharply above the year-ago level. Retail fuel prices also jumped, with regular gasoline rising to $4.452 per gallon and diesel increasing to $5.640 per gallon.

For traders, the report combined several market-moving elements: falling crude inventories, lower imports, tightening fuel stocks, firm demand, and sharply higher prices. That mix helped explain the strong short-term reaction in crude oil futures.

Natural Gas Storage Report: 39-Tick Move on May 7

Natural gas also showed strong sensitivity to DOE storage data. On May 7, 2026, the DOE Natural Gas Storage Report produced a 39-tick move in natural gas within 44 seconds.

For the week ending May 1, working natural gas in underground storage rose by 63 billion cubic feet, reaching 2,205 Bcf. Inventories were 75 Bcf higher than the same week in 2025 and 139 Bcf above the five-year average.

The report showed a generally comfortable storage position as the market moved further into injection season. Most regions posted gains, while the Mountain region recorded a small 2 Bcf withdrawal. The East region added 29 Bcf, the Midwest added 23 Bcf, and South Central added 9 Bcf.

One of the most notable details was the strength of inventories in the western regions. Mountain storage remained 48.2% above the five-year average, while Pacific storage stood 39.6% above the five-year average. By contrast, the East, Midwest, and South Central regions were much closer to normal.

The report suggested that the U.S. natural gas market was entering May with a healthy storage cushion. While national inventories were not excessively high, they were comfortably above both year-ago levels and the five-year average.

U.S. PPI Report: US500 Moves 20 Ticks on May 13

The U.S. BLS Producer Price Index report on May 13, 2026, also produced a fast futures market reaction. According to our analysis, US500 futures moved 5 points, equal to 20 ticks, in 37 seconds following the release.

The April 2026 PPI report showed a sharp acceleration in wholesale inflation. Final demand prices rose 1.4% on a seasonally adjusted monthly basis, following increases of 0.7% in March and 0.6% in February. That marked the largest monthly gain since March 2022.

On a year-over-year basis, final demand prices rose 6.0%, the largest 12-month increase since December 2022.

Services were a major contributor. Final demand services rose 1.2%, with trade services margins up 2.7% and transportation and warehousing services surging 5.0%. Freight costs were especially important, with truck transportation of freight contributing to increases across both final and intermediate demand categories.

Goods prices also rose sharply. Final demand goods increased 2.0%, driven heavily by energy. Final demand energy prices jumped 7.8%, while gasoline rose 15.6% and accounted for more than 40% of the increase in final demand goods prices.

Core producer inflation also strengthened. The index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services rose 0.6%, the largest increase since October 2025. Over 12 months, this core measure increased 4.4%, the largest gain since February 2023.

For equity index futures, the report mattered because it pointed to broader inflation pressure across energy, freight, trade margins, services, and intermediate goods. The data complicated the inflation outlook and likely contributed to the sharp short-term move in US500 futures.

Natural Gas Storage Report: 30-Tick Move on May 28

Natural gas produced another significant move later in the month. On May 28, 2026, the DOE Natural Gas Storage Report triggered a 30-tick move in natural gas within 97 seconds.

For the week ending May 22, U.S. working natural gas in underground storage increased by 92 Bcf, bringing total stocks to 2,483 Bcf. Inventories were 21 Bcf higher than the same week in 2025 and 144 Bcf above the five-year average.

The weekly injection was broad-based across all major Lower 48 storage regions. The East region added 28 Bcf, the Midwest added 34 Bcf, the Mountain region added 3 Bcf, the Pacific region added 6 Bcf, and South Central added 21 Bcf.

At the regional level, Mountain and Pacific inventories remained especially strong relative to historical norms. Mountain storage stood 35.7% above the five-year average, while Pacific storage was 30.9% above the five-year average.

The 92 Bcf build left total U.S. storage within the five-year historical range and above the five-year average heading into the summer cooling season. While the national storage position remained comfortable, the size of the injection and regional details still produced a meaningful short-term futures reaction.

Bottom Line

May 2026 showed continued opportunity across futures news trading, especially around DOE energy reports and U.S. inflation data.

The DOE Petroleum Status Report on May 6 produced a 57-tick crude oil move as inventories tightened and fuel prices surged. The DOE Natural Gas Storage Reports on May 7 and May 28 produced 39-tick and 30-tick moves, respectively, as traders reacted to storage builds and regional inventory details. The U.S. PPI report on May 13 triggered a 20-tick move in US500 futures as wholesale inflation came in hot across headline, core, goods, services, freight, and energy components.

According to our analysis, these events contributed to 911 pips of potential performance in 2026, compared with 1,828 pips in 2025.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

---

Start futures/forex/oil/grains news trading with Haawks G4A low latency machine-readable data today, we offer one of the fastest machine-readable data feeds for US macro-economic and commodity data and macro-economic data from Norway, Sweden, Turkey, Switzerland and ECB interest rates and statement.

Please let us know your feedback and check out our G4A low latency data feed.

All data is machine readable and available via API access in Chicago, New York and London. Free trials.

Greedy 4 Alpha

Low latency machine-readable macro-economic and commodity data for professionals

30 ticks potential profit in 97 seconds on 28 May 2026, analysis on futures news trading natural gas on DOE Natural Gas Storage Report (WNGSR) data

According to our analysis natural gas moved 30 ticks on DOE Natural Gas Storage Report (WNGSR) data on 28 May 2026.

Natural gas (30 ticks)

Charts are exported from JForex (Dukascopy).

---

U.S. Natural Gas Storage Climbs by 92 Bcf, Staying Above the Five-Year Average

U.S. working natural gas in underground storage rose sharply for the week ending May 22, 2026, according to the latest Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Total working gas stocks reached 2,483 billion cubic feet (Bcf), reflecting a net increase of 92 Bcf from the prior week.

The latest build keeps storage levels slightly above both last year’s mark and the five-year average. Stocks were 21 Bcf higher than the same week in 2025 and 144 Bcf above the five-year average of 2,339 Bcf. At 2,483 Bcf, total working gas remains within the five-year historical range.

Regional Storage Trends

The weekly increase was broad-based across all major Lower 48 storage regions.

The East region reported working gas stocks of 447 Bcf, up 28 Bcf from the previous week. Compared with historical levels, East inventories were 2.4% below last year but 1.1% above the five-year average.

The Midwest posted one of the larger regional gains, rising 34 Bcf to 539 Bcf. That placed Midwest stocks 0.4% above year-ago levels and 1.5% above the five-year average.

In the Mountain region, inventories increased by 3 Bcf to 213 Bcf. Storage levels there remained notably elevated, standing 8.1% above last year and 35.7% above the five-year average.

The Pacific region added 6 Bcf, bringing stocks to 292 Bcf. Pacific inventories were 15.4% higher than last year and 30.9% above the five-year average, making it one of the strongest regions relative to historical norms.

The South Central region reported stocks of 993 Bcf, up 21 Bcf from the previous week. Inventories were 2.4% below last year but still 0.6% above the five-year average.

Within South Central, salt storage rose by 7 Bcf to 305 Bcf, while nonsalt storage increased by 15 Bcf to 688 Bcf. Salt storage remained 6.7% below year-ago levels, though it was 2.0% above the five-year average. Nonsalt storage was nearly unchanged from both last year and the five-year average.

Storage Remains Comfortable Heading Into Summer

The 92 Bcf injection marks a sizable weekly build and leaves U.S. natural gas inventories in a relatively comfortable position heading into the summer cooling season. Total storage is not dramatically above historical norms, but it remains meaningfully stronger than the five-year average.

The regional breakdown also shows important differences. The Mountain and Pacific regions continue to hold inventories far above their five-year averages, while the East and South Central regions are modestly below last year’s levels. Still, the national picture points to adequate storage, with total working gas safely within the five-year historical range.

Key Takeaways

For the week ending May 22, 2026:

• Total U.S. working natural gas in storage was 2,483 Bcf

• Inventories increased by 92 Bcf from the previous week

• Stocks were 21 Bcf higher than last year

• Storage was 144 Bcf above the five-year average

• Total working gas remained within the five-year historical range

• The largest weekly regional increases came from the Midwest, East, and South Central regions

Overall, the latest EIA report suggests that U.S. natural gas storage remains well-positioned, with inventories above average and continued injections supporting supply levels ahead of peak summer demand.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct thorough research and consider seeking advice from a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Source: https://ir.eia.gov/ngs/ngs.html

---

Start futures forex fx commodity news trading with Haawks G4A low latency machine-readable data, one of the fastest data feeds for DOE data.

Please let us know your feedback. If you are interested in timestamps, please send us an email to sales@haawks.com.